Iraqi vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iraqi
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iraqis
Latvians
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Iraqi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,414,239 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Iraqi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iraqis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iraqis corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Latvians.
Iraqi vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,760 compared to $52,649, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,764 compared to $108,926, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($100,658 compared to $120,301, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,802 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,466 compared to $67,326, a difference of 11.4%).
Income Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,760 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,658 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,753 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Fair $46,140 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,182 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,666 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,802 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $90,764 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,387 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,466 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Tragic 27.9% |
Iraqi vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 50.4%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Poverty Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.4% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Iraqi vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Iraqi vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Iraqi vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.60%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
Family Households | Average 64.4% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.6% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Iraqi vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.1% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.1% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.6% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Fair 6.1% |
Iraqi vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Education Level Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 39.0% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Iraqi vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Iraqi | Latvian |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.6% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |