Central American vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,264,844 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,560 compared to $52,649, a difference of 36.5%), median family income ($91,087 compared to $120,301, a difference of 32.1%), and median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $63,498, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.30%), householder income over 65 years ($56,321 compared to $67,326, a difference of 19.5%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $43,941, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 72.9%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.1%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.1%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%), family households (66.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple households (43.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.2%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 120.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 76.9%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 18.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.56%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).