Ute vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,052,738 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $52,649, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $115,957, a difference of 38.2%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $120,301, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.33%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $52,783, a difference of 5.6%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $43,941, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 70.3%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 69.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.5%), and single male poverty (15.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.4%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.0%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.60%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 69.1%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 55.3%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.8%).