Czechoslovakian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,693,141 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 115.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $52,649, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $120,301, a difference of 16.5%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $63,498, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $67,326, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.8%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.72%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 43.8%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 16.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.2%).