Zimbabwean vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,617,028 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 24.1 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $52,649, a difference of 14.9%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $63,498, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $108,926, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $67,326, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.7%).