White/Caucasian vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,639,717 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $52,649, a difference of 24.8%), median family income ($99,800 compared to $120,301, a difference of 20.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $108,926, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $52,783, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $67,326, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 39.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 53.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 46.7%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.3%).