Immigrants from Mexico vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,870,372 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.520. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $52,649, a difference of 55.2%), median family income ($83,639 compared to $120,301, a difference of 43.8%), and median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $63,498, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $52,783, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $67,326, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 94.4%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 73.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.1%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.4%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 47.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 136.3%), professional degree (2.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 136.1%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 133.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 27.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%), disability (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.9%).