Cherokee vs Immigrants from Oceania Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Oceania
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Oceania
13.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
2.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Oceania Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,462,276 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,706,575 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 16.4%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 0.50% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 63.0% | 36.2% |
Range | 62.5% | 35.1% |
Mean | 19.6% | 15.4% |
Median | 17.2% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 18.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 7.2% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Comanche (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Salvadoran (13.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Zaire (13.4%, a difference of 0.90%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |
Comanche | 2.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 1.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.4% |
Crow | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.5% |
French American Indians | 1.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.5% |
Iroquois | 1.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Pennsylvania German (11.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
Lebanese | 81.6 /100 | #153 | Excellent 11.1% |
Armenians | 81.4 /100 | #154 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 80.4 /100 | #155 | Excellent 11.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 75.6 /100 | #156 | Good 11.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.2 /100 | #157 | Good 11.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 72.6 /100 | #158 | Good 11.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 70.4 /100 | #159 | Good 11.4% |
French Canadians | 69.5 /100 | #160 | Good 11.4% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.4 /100 | #161 | Good 11.4% |
Alsatians | 68.0 /100 | #162 | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 65.8 /100 | #163 | Good 11.5% |
Immigrants | Chile | 65.0 /100 | #164 | Good 11.5% |
Arabs | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 11.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 11.5% |