Immigrants from Guatemala vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,508,841 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 0.0 Tlingit-Haida.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $62,922, a difference of 16.6%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $101,092, a difference of 15.9%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $43,516, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $55,914, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($40,851 compared to $45,468, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 65.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 64.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 139.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.6%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.8% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 5.4%), family households (65.0% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.16, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 146.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and college, under 1 year (56.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.4%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 73.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.5%).