Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Tlingit-Haida
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Tlingit-Haida
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,201
SOCIAL INDEX
49.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
182nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tlingit-Haida Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,857,485 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Tlingit-Haida. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 14.2 Tlingit-Haida.
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $55,914, a difference of 18.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $62,922, a difference of 17.1%), and median household income ($74,279 compared to $83,968, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.7%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $52,409, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $45,468, a difference of 7.2%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Average $43,516 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Fair $101,092 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Fair $83,968 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Fair $45,468 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Poor $52,409 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Average $39,513 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $55,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Fair $92,987 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Poor $97,417 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Excellent $62,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 44.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 42.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 12.7%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Fair 13.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.6% |
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 122.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 23.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Fair 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 20.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 40.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.2%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and family households (62.2% compared to 61.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 61.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Tragic 45.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Fair 32.2% |
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Good 55.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Good 19.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.43%), associate's degree (42.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.45%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 34.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 12.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Poor 1.7% |
Iroquois vs Tlingit-Haida Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.0%), disability (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Tlingit-Haida |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 50.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Good 2.4% |