Iroquois vs Nigerian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,409,452 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 13.5 Nigerians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $81,725, a difference of 10.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $58,992, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $95,492, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $49,416, a difference of 4.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $87,730, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $41,026, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.1%), single female poverty (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.29%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.6%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 40.0%), male disability (13.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 5.2%).