Chickasaw vs Nigerian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nigerian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Nigerians

Fair
Poor
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nigerian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,579,054 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 21.2 Nigerians.
Chickasaw Integration in Nigerian Communities

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $81,725, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $95,492, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,039, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,992, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,416, a difference of 10.4%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Income
Income MetricChickasawNigerian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Tragic
$41,026
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Tragic
$97,522
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Poor
$81,725
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Tragic
$52,039
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Average
$39,641
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Tragic
$49,416
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Tragic
$87,730
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Tragic
$95,492
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Poor
$58,992
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
23.0%

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.2%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawNigerian
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.1%

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawNigerian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawNigerian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Average
82.7%

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawNigerian
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Tragic
43.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Tragic
35.3%

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 53.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.4%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawNigerian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Poor
6.0%

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.58%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawNigerian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Average
14.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.8%

Chickasaw vs Nigerian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.1%).
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Disability
Disability MetricChickasawNigerian
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Good
2.4%