Chickasaw vs Nigerian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Nigerian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Nigerians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Nigerian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,579,054 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 21.2 Nigerians.
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $81,725, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $95,492, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,039, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,992, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,416, a difference of 10.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $41,026 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $97,522 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Poor $81,725 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,532 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $52,039 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,641 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $49,416 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $87,730 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $95,492 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Poor $58,992 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.2%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Fair 36.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.7% |
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 35.3% |
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 53.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 64.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 45.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Nigerian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Nigerian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Poor 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |