Creek vs Nigerian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,850,740 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Nigerians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $95,492, a difference of 20.9%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $81,725, a difference of 20.7%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $39,641, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $49,416, a difference of 8.9%), median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $52,039, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $58,992, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 32.9%), single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.3%), and single female poverty (27.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.6%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 55.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.1%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 41.7%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 65.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.2%).