Osage vs Maltese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,473,072 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Maltese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 39.8 Maltese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $110,064, a difference of 30.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $114,754, a difference of 29.8%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $97,015, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $53,735, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $66,027, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 46.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.68%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.1%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Maltese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.6%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.3%).