Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,748,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.534% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 534.2 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $94,423, a difference of 14.8%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $53,201, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $59,656, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $39,328, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($43,416 compared to $46,478, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 15.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.32%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.8%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.33, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.0%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (36.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.33%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.75%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%).