Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from South Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,740,128 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.848. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.347% in Immigrants from South Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 347.2 Immigrants from South Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $51,465, a difference of 12.4%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $62,899, a difference of 11.7%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,705, a difference of 0.87%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $67,234, a difference of 2.1%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $42,508, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.91%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from South Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 7.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.2%).