Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,217,411 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.749. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $49,463, a difference of 45.8%), median male earnings ($44,960 compared to $61,040, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $113,434, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $55,522, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $64,462, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.2%), family poverty (12.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 56.8%), and receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 48.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (69.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.2%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 103.3%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 92.7%), and no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 90.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 26.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%).