South American vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,904,632 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,114 compared to $49,463, a difference of 12.1%), median male earnings ($54,492 compared to $61,040, a difference of 12.0%), and median family income ($101,856 compared to $113,434, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,939 compared to $55,522, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $42,718, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,854 compared to $64,462, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.24%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 19.2%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.3%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%).