Chippewa vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,096,764 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $49,463, a difference of 35.0%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $94,222, a difference of 33.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $110,633, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $55,522, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $64,462, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 54.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 48.9%), and male poverty (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 87.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 52.9%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.5%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 54.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.3%).