Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,417,365 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 28.2 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.9%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $58,835, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $49,682, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $41,183, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $50,729, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $64,521, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.5%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.82%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 29.1%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.50%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.6%).