Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,189,383 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,209 compared to $50,729, a difference of 6.9%), per capita income ($49,627 compared to $46,938, a difference of 5.7%), and wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,264 compared to $108,471, a difference of 0.19%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,415 compared to $101,124, a difference of 0.29%), and median earnings ($49,841 compared to $49,682, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 18.9%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.30, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 32.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.2%).