Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,010,841 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,979 compared to $50,417, a difference of 9.7%), median male earnings ($58,452 compared to $60,914, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($49,633 compared to $51,581, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($90,549 compared to $92,225, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,319 compared to $108,304, a difference of 1.9%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.7%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.050%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.9%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.25%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.5%).