Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Croatia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,508,884 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Croatia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Immigrants from Croatia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $50,417, a difference of 32.5%), median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $60,914, a difference of 28.3%), and median family income ($88,267 compared to $112,323, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $54,343, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $43,258, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 73.3%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 55.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.14%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.8%), and births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.9%), family households (67.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.14, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.2%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Croatia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.88%).