Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,504,956 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.489% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 2,489.4 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 38.4%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $93,373, a difference of 16.6%), and per capita income ($47,394 compared to $40,949, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $40,973, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $55,210, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($48,913 compared to $45,470, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 68.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.83%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 51.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 38.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 197.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 27.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 57.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 66.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.98%).