Immigrants from Russia vs Guyanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,804,563 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guyanese within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Guyanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 72.9 Guyanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 44.1%), per capita income ($52,044 compared to $40,949, a difference of 27.1%), and median family income ($116,942 compared to $93,373, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $55,210, a difference of 1.2%), median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $40,973, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $56,351, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 54.9%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.39%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 35.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 24.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 38.3%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 94.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 70.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 42.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 82.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 61.0%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Guyanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.19%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%).