Chickasaw vs Danish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Danish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Danes
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Danish Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,384,526 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Danes within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 11.4 Danes.
![Chickasaw Integration in Danish Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Danish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,619, a difference of 28.5%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,676, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $97,221, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,730, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,392, a difference of 14.1%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Good $44,095 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $105,900 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Excellent $87,676 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,392 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,246 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,730 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Excellent $53,041 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $97,221 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $105,619 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,117 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 31.0% |
Chickasaw vs Danish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 20.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chickasaw vs Danish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Chickasaw vs Danish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Good 65.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 44.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Danish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 51.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Chickasaw vs Danish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 63.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 24.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Chickasaw vs Danish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 38.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Danish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Danish Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-danes/chickasaw-vs-danes-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Danish |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |