Australian vs Danish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,482,435 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Danes within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 53.5 Danes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $44,095, a difference of 18.1%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $37,730, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($52,294 compared to $46,392, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $53,041, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $63,117, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $105,619, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 18.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.4% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 7.8%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.080%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 53.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.9%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Danish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%).