Laotian vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,563,985 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.266% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 266.2 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,051 compared to $74,257, a difference of 49.5%), median household income ($94,990 compared to $63,681, a difference of 49.2%), and per capita income ($47,041 compared to $31,729, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $47,012, a difference of 15.7%), median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $35,266, a difference of 19.5%), and median earnings ($50,343 compared to $38,707, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 110.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 102.9%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 100.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 29.5%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and single mother poverty (27.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 243.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 225.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 223.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.6%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.75%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.0%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 60.1%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.37%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 10th grade (93.6% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 44.5%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.6%).