Hawaiian vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,931,247 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 5.8 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,729 compared to $63,681, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $74,257, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $49,234, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $35,266, a difference of 6.3%), median earnings ($43,673 compared to $38,707, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $47,012, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 100.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 85.9%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.9%), single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 43.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 211.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 207.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 202.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 32.2%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.82, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 37.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.8%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.23%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%).