Immigrants from Central America vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 302,401,805 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $37,695, a difference of 7.8%), median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $48,402, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $35,864, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $86,595, a difference of 0.73%), median household income ($74,217 compared to $73,509, a difference of 0.96%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $54,029, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.67%), male poverty (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 12.7%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.1% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.050%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 78.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 25.7%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.16%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.7%).