Iroquois vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,897,687 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 22.1 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,104 compared to $37,695, a difference of 3.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $81,531, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $48,603, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $54,029, a difference of 0.54%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $86,595, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.0%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.4%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.4%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.65%).