Chickasaw vs Bahamian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bahamian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Bahamians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bahamian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,060,637 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.880. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 142.2 Bahamians.
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 34.2%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $44,756, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $51,000, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,427, a difference of 0.13%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $69,726, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $81,369, a difference of 1.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $36,427 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $82,631 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $69,726 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $39,735 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $44,756 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $35,125 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,743 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $75,395 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $81,369 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $51,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.2%), poverty (14.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 17.2%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 41.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 40.8% |
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%), college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Poor 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Bahamian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Bahamian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |