Immigrants from England vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,156,353 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.359% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 358.9 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $65,329, a difference of 26.1%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and per capita income ($48,844 compared to $45,195, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $101,936, a difference of 0.080%), median household income ($92,098 compared to $91,991, a difference of 0.12%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $110,201, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 42.0%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 41.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.6% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.63%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.1%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.3%).