Portuguese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,364,180 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $91,385, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $86,736, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $38,028, a difference of 5.7%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $57,114, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($48,032 compared to $43,998, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.5%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.30%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.1%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.040%), college, 1 year or more (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 43.3%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.63%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%).