Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,097,953 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.629. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 59.9 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,170 compared to $91,385, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $57,114, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,717 compared to $38,028, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($45,933 compared to $43,998, a difference of 4.4%), and per capita income ($41,678 compared to $39,827, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 10.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (66.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.020%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and male disability (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.29%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.7%).