Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

COMPARE

Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Soviet Union

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Good
Fair
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Soviet Union Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,163,717 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.101% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 101.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Soviet Union Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $39,827, a difference of 36.1%), median family income ($119,262 compared to $94,472, a difference of 26.2%), and median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $50,298, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 6.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $57,114, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $48,749, a difference of 13.5%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
Income MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,202
Tragic
$39,827
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,262
Tragic
$94,472
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,098
Tragic
$78,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,290
Tragic
$43,998
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,382
Tragic
$50,298
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,556
Tragic
$38,028
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,340
Tragic
$48,749
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,457
Tragic
$86,736
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,008
Tragic
$91,385
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,848
Tragic
$57,114
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.2%
Exceptional
22.8%

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 38.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 11.8%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
Poverty MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.5%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
20.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Tragic
30.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Fair
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.4%

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.90%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.4%
Exceptional
39.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
82.0%

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (60.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Family Households
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.2%
Tragic
44.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.3%
Poor
32.9%

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 67.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.7%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
82.7%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.7%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Fair
6.2%

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 66.3%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
Education Level MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
96.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
90.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
88.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
86.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.1%
Tragic
62.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.1%
Tragic
43.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
35.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Poor
1.7%

Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
Disability MetricSoviet UnionImmigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Average
2.5%