Venezuelan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,032,145 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Venezuelan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Venezuelans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Venezuelans corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 15.2%), per capita income ($42,074 compared to $39,827, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,460 compared to $91,385, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($44,580 compared to $43,998, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,026 compared to $57,114, a difference of 1.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,232 compared to $86,736, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.93%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 9.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 58.2%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.8%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Venezuelan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and female disability (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%).