Israeli vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,749,867 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,596 compared to $39,827, a difference of 32.1%), median male earnings ($63,228 compared to $50,298, a difference of 25.7%), and median family income ($118,577 compared to $94,472, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $48,749, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($43,852 compared to $38,028, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $57,114, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 26.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.68%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.87%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 75.6%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 64.2%), and doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.75%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.2%).