Barbadian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,272,198 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 84.5 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.5%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $38,028, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $48,749, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($93,919 compared to $94,472, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $91,385, a difference of 1.2%), and median household income ($79,664 compared to $78,682, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.8%), receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.31%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 25.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.030%), family households (62.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 150.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 40.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 49.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (86.7% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.010%), ged/equivalency (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.7%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.43%).