French Canadian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,291,050 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to an increase of 21.0 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 22.9%), median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $50,298, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $91,385, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $38,028, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $57,114, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($46,026 compared to $43,998, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.7%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.79%), single female poverty (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.73%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.7%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.7% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.6%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.35%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.6%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).