Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,440,500 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.338% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 338.0 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $86,736, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($46,455 compared to $39,827, a difference of 16.6%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $78,682, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $48,749, a difference of 2.2%), median female earnings ($40,576 compared to $38,028, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($47,902 compared to $43,998, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 40.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.93%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.4%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 26.2%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (94.8% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.37%), 9th grade (93.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and 8th grade (94.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.58%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.7%).