Dominican vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,953,090 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Dominican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dominicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dominicans corresponds to a decrease of 3.8 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,964 compared to $57,114, a difference of 21.6%), median family income ($82,888 compared to $94,472, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,623 compared to $91,385, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $48,749, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($37,046 compared to $38,028, a difference of 2.6%), and median earnings ($41,864 compared to $43,998, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 66.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 3.1%), single female poverty (25.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 51.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 51.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.2%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and married-couple households (38.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 182.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 77.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 67.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 26.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 52.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 67.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.6%), college, under 1 year (55.5% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and college, 1 year or more (50.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 24.4%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.8%).