Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,226,840 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $48,749, a difference of 10.8%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $57,114, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,202 compared to $38,028, a difference of 0.46%), median earnings ($43,750 compared to $43,998, a difference of 0.57%), and per capita income ($39,558 compared to $39,827, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.3%), single male poverty (15.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and family poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 89.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 72.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.0%), and female unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 44.6%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 16.5%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 67.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 113.3%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 160.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.0%).