Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,144,140 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.185% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 184.8 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,569 compared to $39,827, a difference of 16.9%), median family income ($108,251 compared to $94,472, a difference of 14.6%), and median household income ($89,640 compared to $78,682, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $48,749, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $86,736, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 23.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father poverty (13.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.1%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and family households (61.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 0.49%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.1%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.6%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.4%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.3%).