Paraguayan vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,253,046 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to an increase of 143.8 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,385 compared to $39,827, a difference of 26.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $86,736, a difference of 22.9%), and median household income ($95,737 compared to $78,682, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,443 compared to $57,114, a difference of 12.8%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($43,173 compared to $38,028, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 35.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 37.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.5%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.0%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 75.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.5%).