Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,153,909 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $91,385, a difference of 12.7%), and median family income ($104,410 compared to $94,472, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $38,028, a difference of 0.73%), median earnings ($46,433 compared to $43,998, a difference of 5.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $57,114, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.2%), family poverty (7.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 38.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.6%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 48.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 109.6%), college, under 1 year (67.7% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and college, 1 year or more (61.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.41%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.94%).