Salvadoran vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,069,336 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $48,749, a difference of 13.7%), median household income ($82,449 compared to $78,682, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,842 compared to $91,385, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($94,109 compared to $94,472, a difference of 0.38%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,198 compared to $86,736, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.1%), births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and family households (67.2% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.5% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 19.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.75%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.1%).