Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,798,032 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to an increase of 100.8 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $48,749, a difference of 14.7%), householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $57,114, a difference of 10.2%), and per capita income ($43,516 compared to $39,827, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,468 compared to $43,998, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($39,513 compared to $38,028, a difference of 3.9%), and median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $50,298, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 34.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 168.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 51.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.7%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 1.6%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 116.5%), college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and high school diploma (91.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 0.58%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and associate's degree (43.0% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 64.9%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.7%).