Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,416,190 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.364. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to a decrease of 63.2 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 23.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $91,385, a difference of 10.9%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $50,298, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $38,028, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $48,749, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $43,998, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.5%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 31.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.8%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 93.9%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%).