Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Thailand
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Thailand

Czechs

Fair
Excellent
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Immigrants from Thailand Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,768,514 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 148.6 Czechs.
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Czech Communities

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 18.9%), median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $56,546, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $103,507, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $38,992, a difference of 0.47%), householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $51,421, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $61,244, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,289
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,840
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,327
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,598
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,908
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,810
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,645
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,337
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$97,400
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$60,217
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.5%
Tragic
29.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.6%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.9%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.5%), currently married (45.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.0%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 81.0%), associate's degree (45.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and ged/equivalency (84.5% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.5%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.4%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Thailand vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ThailandCzech
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%